Difference between revisions of "Main Page"

From E-Consultation Guide
Jump to: navigation, search
(A guide to e-consultation)
(E-consultation ideas)
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
__NOTOC__
 
__NOTOC__
 +
<div style="float:left;" width="50%">
 
==A guide to e-consultation==
 
==A guide to e-consultation==
<div style="float:left;" width="50%">
 
 
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 3px 3px;" >
 
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 3px 3px;" >
 
Main Topics
 
Main Topics
Line 12: Line 12:
 
*[[Participating]] in an e-consultation
 
*[[Participating]] in an e-consultation
 
**[[Depth of Engagement]]
 
**[[Depth of Engagement]]
**[[Six Consultation Criteria]]
+
**[[The Six Consultation Criteria]]
**[[Criteria for a Demoractic Process]]
+
**[[Criteria for a Democratic Process]]
 
**[[Criteria for a Deliberative Process]]
 
**[[Criteria for a Deliberative Process]]
**Who?
 
**How many?
 
 
**[[Engaging participants]]
 
**[[Engaging participants]]
 
**How to participate
 
**How to participate
Line 22: Line 20:
 
**Consultation [[processes]]
 
**Consultation [[processes]]
 
**[[Technology]] for e-consultation
 
**[[Technology]] for e-consultation
Prepared by the [http://www.e-consultation.org/ E-Consultation Research Project].
 
</div>
 
  
<div style="padding-left:10em; float:left;" width="50%">
 
 
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 3px 3px;" >
 
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 3px 3px;" >
 
First steps for:
 
First steps for:
Line 42: Line 37:
 
*[[References]] to external resources
 
*[[References]] to external resources
 
*[[Writing this guide]]
 
*[[Writing this guide]]
 +
 +
Prepared by the [http://www.e-consultation.org/ E-Consultation Research Project].
 +
</div>
 +
== E-consultation ideas ==
 +
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 2px 2px;" >
 +
Helping solve the housing crisis in SE England
 +
</div>
 +
A team at the Deloite Datathon in Reading came up with the idea of an [{{filepath:FINAL_Presentation.pdf}} interactive consultation tool].
 +
 +
Citizens will go online to tell planners where they would like houses to be built, using all the data available over a large area. They can enter their conditions using sliders. As they change their preferences, more or less of the map will be removed, showing which areas meet their preferences. When hundreds of people have used the tool, planners will have information not only on where people prefer houses to build, but which criteria are more important to citizens.
 +
<div style="font-size:150%; text-decoration:none; font-weight:bold; padding: 2px 2px;" >
 +
Distributed conversations for collaborative decision-making
 
</div>
 
</div>
 +
This is a proposal developed at the 2017 Online Deliberation Unconference.
 +
 +
Once upon a time America Speaks ran 21st Century Town Meetings, in which 600 tables of 10 people all talked about a problem. Using networked computers in a room, they collected ideas from the tables and synthesised recommendations.
 +
 +
Now that Internet video conferencing is more reliable, we can use the same model, distributed across a country or the world, where each group of 10 looks at a presentation to start their discussion, then discusses the issue locally (or with online breakout groups), feeding back ideas.
 +
 +
Who would like to join in setting up an experiment on this model?

Latest revision as of 17:31, 25 July 2018

A guide to e-consultation

Main Topics

First steps for:

Resources

Prepared by the E-Consultation Research Project.

E-consultation ideas

Helping solve the housing crisis in SE England

A team at the Deloite Datathon in Reading came up with the idea of an interactive consultation tool.

Citizens will go online to tell planners where they would like houses to be built, using all the data available over a large area. They can enter their conditions using sliders. As they change their preferences, more or less of the map will be removed, showing which areas meet their preferences. When hundreds of people have used the tool, planners will have information not only on where people prefer houses to build, but which criteria are more important to citizens.

Distributed conversations for collaborative decision-making

This is a proposal developed at the 2017 Online Deliberation Unconference.

Once upon a time America Speaks ran 21st Century Town Meetings, in which 600 tables of 10 people all talked about a problem. Using networked computers in a room, they collected ideas from the tables and synthesised recommendations.

Now that Internet video conferencing is more reliable, we can use the same model, distributed across a country or the world, where each group of 10 looks at a presentation to start their discussion, then discusses the issue locally (or with online breakout groups), feeding back ideas.

Who would like to join in setting up an experiment on this model?